WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-4.0.0 RC9 Test Report. Xen: #21087 & Dom0: #4ebd13..

To: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-4.0.0 RC9 Test Report. Xen: #21087 & Dom0: #4ebd13...
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:55:51 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:56:39 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731D6869B3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcrVZdWHsO3qziLZSsizoRLuswj0mgAB+wXDAADHFWAAA88hzw==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Xen-4.0.0 RC9 Test Report. Xen: #21087 & Dom0: #4ebd13...
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
On 06/04/2010 11:16, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Keir, really thanks for your patch very much. I should not take leave in last
> Friday and this monday :( In fact, although your patch fixed the issue in my
> mail, but there still another bug in PM side for CPU online/offline, which
> will cause panic sometimes, so anyway, CPU online/offline can't pass our
> stress test in xen 4.0.

Okay, well, seems we will get there for 4.0.1 instead. Thanks!

> I'm testing the patch. Seems it at least passed loop count 500, o*line all
> APs, leaves only BSP online.
> A potential issue in the patch is, in following change, it may trigger the
> assert of __sync_lazy_execstate(), which assume current is idle_vcpu, however,
> at this time, we can't gurrante this. A check for current vcpu is needed.

Oh yes, obviously I didn't test my own patch. ;-) Well I will make that
change and apply the patch to xen-unstable. We can wait to backport to
4.0-testing until we have a complete set of patches which pass all your
tests.

> Again, really thanks for your help on this.

Thank *you*!

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel