On 06/04/2010 11:16, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keir, really thanks for your patch very much. I should not take leave in last
> Friday and this monday :( In fact, although your patch fixed the issue in my
> mail, but there still another bug in PM side for CPU online/offline, which
> will cause panic sometimes, so anyway, CPU online/offline can't pass our
> stress test in xen 4.0.
Okay, well, seems we will get there for 4.0.1 instead. Thanks!
> I'm testing the patch. Seems it at least passed loop count 500, o*line all
> APs, leaves only BSP online.
> A potential issue in the patch is, in following change, it may trigger the
> assert of __sync_lazy_execstate(), which assume current is idle_vcpu, however,
> at this time, we can't gurrante this. A check for current vcpu is needed.
Oh yes, obviously I didn't test my own patch. ;-) Well I will make that
change and apply the patch to xen-unstable. We can wait to backport to
4.0-testing until we have a complete set of patches which pass all your
tests.
> Again, really thanks for your help on this.
Thank *you*!
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|