WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0x allows for data corruption in Dom0

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0x allows for data corruption in Dom0
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:34:40 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B96D9AD.3060705@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C7BBD051.C7A6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 4B96D9AD.3060705@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Am I correct in reading between the lines that this means
that Xen 4.0 will not support fast (vsyscall) gettimeofday?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [mailto:jeremy@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:29 PM
> To: Keir Fraser
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joanna Rutkowska; =?ISO-8859-
> 1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4in?=@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jan Beulich; Daniel
> Stodden
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0x allows for data corruption in Dom0
> 
> On 03/09/2010 02:15 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > A quite suitable fix for 4.0.0 is to leave the hypercall stubbed out
> imo.
> >
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>      J
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>