| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7][v4] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen
|
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7][v4] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen |
|
From: |
Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:34:56 +0800 |
|
Cc: |
xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:34:30 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4B8C6AA4.8000700@xxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Organization: |
Intel Opensource Technology Center |
|
References: |
<1267436315-24486-1-git-send-email-sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201003020926.03512.sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B8C6AA4.8000700@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-19-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 09:32:20 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/01/2010 05:26 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> >> Why 2.6.33? I'm currently working on 2.6.32; I intend to move to .33
> >> shortly, but .32 is a much more convenient base (particularly if you're
> >> interested in getting these changes into any distro kernels).
> >>
> >> I rebased it to .32 without much effort.
> >
> > OK.
>
> Hm, looks like the x86_platform_ipi stuff is missing in .32.
>
I thought that one should still called smp_generic_interrupt in .32?
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home