|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynami
To: |
"Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features |
From: |
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:04:51 +0000 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>, GeorgeDunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PatrickColp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Peace <Andrew.Peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:05:49 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>>> Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 08.02.10 19:13 >>>
>Are there other known order>0 allocations that might result
>in similar issues?
Interestingly, tmem itself indirectly causes order-1 allocations (through
the use of xmem_pool_create(), sizeof(struct xmem_pool) = 0x18d0
on a non-debug build).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features,
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|