 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] sync_console meaning
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] sync_console meaning |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:21:33 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:22:10 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Isn't sync_console supposed to have the effect of not losing any output? If so, this must have got broken - I've just got a log file thus created (on c/s 20900) which clearly has missing parts. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features, Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm: Fix xm network-list for XenAPI, Masaki Kanno |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] sync_console meaning, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
