xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynami
To: |
"Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] RE: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features |
From: |
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:18:53 +0000 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>, GeorgeDunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PatrickColp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Peace <Andrew.Peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:19:56 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<b5a8d8a9-e991-4118-9783-8be1f29fef52@default> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<4B7D02B302000078000300BF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b5a8d8a9-e991-4118-9783-8be1f29fef52@default> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>>> Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 18.02.10 17:09 >>>
>But ignoring my flimsy excuses, Jan, do you have some debug code
>you are using to identify order>0 allocations? If so, could I
>have a copy... and perhaps Keir would consider adding
>it post-4.0 to make it easier to search-and-destroy.
I actually noticed this only as a side effect from a much uglier debugging
patch - observing apparent memory corruption with no apparent pattern
during save/restore/migrate, I finally decided to try a brute force method
and track all allocations. Since you are so eager to point out and fix all
order > 0 allocations, I was quite surprised to see one while tmem
itself initialized its state for Dom0. Hence I thought I'd point it out. The
patch as it stands is, I think, not really a general debugging aid - if you
think differently, I can of course still share it.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Previous by Date: |
[Xen-devel] RE: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features, Dan Magenheimer |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] pv guest numa [RE: Host Numa informtion in dom0], Dulloor |
Previous by Thread: |
[Xen-devel] RE: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features, Dan Magenheimer |
Next by Thread: |
[Xen-devel] RE: Memory fragmentation, order>0 allocation, and 4.0 dynamic RAM optimization features, Dan Magenheimer |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|