xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups
>From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2010年2月5日 16:49
>
>Yes, this patch works for us too. So a non-hacky version of it would be
>appreciated.
>
>I also meanwhile tried out the idea to reduce the contention on
>xtime_lock (attached for reference). Things appear to work fine, but
>there is an obvious problem (with - thus far to me - no obvious
>explanation) with it: The number of timer interrupts on CPUs not on
>duty to run do_timer() and alike is increasing significantly,
>with spikes
>of over 100,000 per second. I'm investigating this, but of course any
>idea anyone of you might have what could be causing this would be
>very welcome.
>
forgive my poor english. From your patch, only cpu on duty will invoke
do_timer to update global timestamp. Why in your test it's CPUs 'not
on duty' to have high frequent do_timer? I may read it wrong. :-(
Thanks,
Kevin _______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Yu, Ke
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups,
Tian, Kevin <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich
|
|
|