|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RFS: xen-qemu-dm (new package)
To: |
Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] RFS: xen-qemu-dm (new package) |
From: |
Samuel Thibault <sthibault@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:58:16 +0100 |
Cc: |
Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Motschke <christian@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:59:32 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4B55FC1B.2060106@xxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Mail-followup-to: |
Samuel Thibault <sthibault@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>, Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Motschke <christian@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
References: |
<4B557FF9.2090208@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100119104731.GE4780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B55C71B.2010601@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100119162427.GZ4780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1263925331.2104.6.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> <20100119173925.GC4780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B55FC1B.2060106@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Thomas Goirand, le Wed 20 Jan 2010 02:38:19 +0800, a écrit :
> If you have a look at the one but the least line in debian/rules, you have:
>
> binary: binary-indep binary-arch
>
> Am I still missing something here or... ?
The fact that dpkg-buildpackage -B doesn't use binary, but only
binary-arch. That's one of the points of -B: only generate arch-specific
packages, not arch-indep packages.
Really, did you try a fresh unpack of your package and run
dpkg-buildpackage -B
?
Here it builds everything, sure, but in the end it realizes it didn't
actual build any .deb:
dpkg-genchanges -B >../xen-qemu-dm-3.4_3.4.2-1_amd64.changes
dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages
Really, apply the attached patch.
Samuel
patch
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|