WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] RFS: xen-qemu-dm (new package)

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>, Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Motschke <christian@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RFS: xen-qemu-dm (new package)
From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:38:19 +0800
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:38:44 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=postfix; bh=Xbqh1iMOq laD46ViDTwYISUmQJo=; b=V0DXR/00T6fXW7Bn85ijWwyAAxRSyLQjNHq3cH1GT /g2FSxGC13P622BvRyG9VZo8aMJTzG29+V1r6rEoa40KqBjUzlO2H1c8Boiw0SWV t77Fk5255hsdiV6Bed4B3rthS2lBQfEcZy2kgzQDTF4aBW3kzcwcomsDO344mtpW 28=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b=sjM LgLNcD1BtPszWCY9g0WM9Hjm6whNTCRYotkfsW+XPDMAOnmzSwvzSYIQyBY0ZVh0 dF4rRRTqBRXxQHfULhYGutNaioA+xxxRqolyNbKiPV2z1gxnYv8eGgQzFyvZNxGu /TsMiGKzXYNDQ+waZd3TS3iFTs+e82AaTw0+hQzE=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100119173925.GC4780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=98EF9A49
Organization: GPLHost
References: <4B557FF9.2090208@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100119104731.GE4780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B55C71B.2010601@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100119162427.GZ4780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1263925331.2104.6.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> <20100119173925.GC4780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707)
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Goirand, le Wed 20 Jan 2010 02:22:11 +0800, a écrit :
>>> That won't work either.
>>>
>>> Everything you are currently doing in binary-indep should be moved to
>>> binary-arch, else dpkg-buildpackage -B (i.e. what buildds do) won't
>>> build any package...
>>>
>>> Samuel
>> you can try,
> 
> I did
> 
>> it does work...
> 
> It didn't
> 
>> Even though it's not very clean, binary-arch
>> depends on install that itself depends on build.
> 
> but doesn't depend on binary-indep which does the actual work of
> building a .deb...

If you have a look at the one but the least line in debian/rules, you have:

binary: binary-indep binary-arch

Am I still missing something here or... ?

Thomas

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel