| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: rdtsc: correctness vs performance on Xen (and KVM?)
> On 01/09/2009 15:53, "Dan Magenheimer"
> <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > 1) fake rdmsr (or hypercall if it works) returns a virtual
> > address within a range of addresses that is not "owned by"
> > the OS (e.g. maybe in Xen address space?). The page is
> > only readable outside of ring 0, but writeable in ring 0
> > (by Xen).
> > 2) All TLB misses on this page are handled directly by Xen
> > so the OS never sees the address/page.
>
> I think these are probably possible, at least for a 64-bit
> hypervisor which
> isn't playing segment limit tricks.
Will it work for pv32_on_64? (I don't care much about
32-bit hypervisor.)
> > If these are OK, and you see other parts of the proposal
> > that require PV kernel mods, please point them out.
>
> Won't the pvclock computation be per-cpu? How will you deal with
> that?
Hmmm... is it possible for the same virtual address/page
to map to a different physical address/page on each processor?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home