WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: rdtsc: correctness vs performance on Xen (and KVM?)

To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: rdtsc: correctness vs performance on Xen (and KVM?)
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:34:07 +0100
Cc: "Xen-Devel \(E-mail\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:35:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3940b60d-49e7-4b2a-97ed-f7981b734eb0@default>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcorC8VLMGhkyq/OTYGQzo0RPRmeWgABX2VN
Thread-topic: rdtsc: correctness vs performance on Xen (and KVM?)
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515
On 01/09/2009 14:54, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
>> Making vsyscall work...
> 
> While I highly respect your opinion, and while vsyscall
> may be a fine choice in the future, it just doesn't
> solve the problem today and won't solve it ever for
> currently shipping PV OS's.  If you can figure out a
> way to allow vsyscall to be installed as a module and
> still achieve its performance, it
> might be a possible solution, but otherwise we have
> to go around the OS to solve this problem.

Do you believe there's a solution which doesn't involve PV kernel
modifications? I think the suggestions you've made so far would require such
modifications.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel