|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: rdtsc: correctness vs performance on Xen (and KVM?) 
| On 01/09/2009 15:53, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1) fake rdmsr (or hypercall if it works) returns a virtual
>    address within a range of addresses that is not "owned by"
>    the OS (e.g. maybe in Xen address space?).  The page is
>    only readable outside of ring 0, but writeable in ring 0
>    (by Xen).
> 2) All TLB misses on this page are handled directly by Xen
>    so the OS never sees the address/page.
I think these are probably possible, at least for a 64-bit hypervisor which
isn't playing segment limit tricks.
> If these are OK, and you see other parts of the proposal
> that require PV kernel mods, please point them out.
Won't the pvclock computation be per-cpu? How will you deal with that?
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |