|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches
I outlined the solution in the mail you responded to here. It's a single place
that needs changing, afaict. Jan
>>> Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> 10.07.09 10:09 >>>
OK. What's the right thing to do ?
Please, advise.
Boris.
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches
To: "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>, "Boris Derzhavets"
<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, July 10, 2009, 4:00 AM
>>> Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> 07.07.09 19:12 >>>
>3. Made global replacement CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ by CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS in
>files
>60035_xen3-patch-2.6.29.patch1,60036_xen3-patch-2.6.30.patch1
This certainly doesn't sound right.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, (continued)
[Xen-devel] 2.6.30.1-rc2 dom0 tarball, Daniel Schroeder
[Xen-users] updated dom0 tarballs, Daniel Schroeder
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Kris Shannon
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches,
Jan Beulich <=
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.30 dom0 Xen patches, Boris Derzhavets
|
|
|
|
|