|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fix s3 resume on AMD CPUs
>>> Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> 15.06.09 17:33 >>>
>@@ -174,8 +177,11 @@ wakeup_64:
> mov $(__HYPERVISOR_DS64), %eax
> mov %eax, %ds
>
>- # long jump to return point, with cs reload
>- rex64 ljmp *ret_point(%rip)
>+ /* Continue with wakeup in the high-level wakeup code.
>+ * Reload cs there.
>+ */
>+ movq ret_point(%rip), %rbx
>+ jmp *%rbx
>
> .align 8
> ret_point:
Why do you add a comment ("Reload cs here") here that is not in sync with
the changed code?
Also, if the sole reference ro ret_point is now a near jump, why don't you
remove the selector part of ret_point itself? Further more, why does this
need to be an indirect jump now that it's not a far jump anymore?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|