AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Future of xenbits Linux trees

["Carsten Schiers" <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Go ahead!  It is really time to stop forward-porting stuff.  The time 
is 
> much better spent in adding the missing features to pv_ops/dom0.  Also 

> just after the 3.4 release is the perfect moment for that move, 3.5 
> should be able to ship with a pv_ops based kernel then.

I'd vote for that, too. Whatever comes out of that discussion on 
"coolness"
on lkml ;o), I guess pv_ops is what will be the outcome. Inside or 
outside
the linux kernel tree.

What I'd like to add is that I would prefer a better tagging of the 
kernel 
repo to identify subversion of the kernel that belong to a certain 
version 
of Xen, whatever kernel that might be. Fixes and improvements are 
happening
so quickly that on the pure user's side the combination can make a 
difference,
no matter how much effort you put in to keep it independent. 

BR,
Carsten.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel