| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Future of xenbits Linux trees
|
To: |
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Future of xenbits Linux trees |
|
From: |
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:13:07 +0200 |
|
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Tramnitz <chris.ace@xxxxxxx>, Ian@xxxxxxxxxx |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:16:24 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA3417372D258@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<h0b67q$lsg$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C64EDDF5.7916%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <940bcfd20906050705x67b51453h715e4d22c9caea61@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA3417372D258@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2 |
On 06/05/09 16:37, Ian Pratt wrote:
One of the reasons cited for sticking on 2.6.18 was that it would
hopefully encourage folk to use pv_ops if they wanted anything more
modern. I'm not sure that worked out too well...
Making the pv_ops kernel the officially one in xen-unstable should work
better I think.
It strikes me it's not a bad plan to have two trees, one based
off the latest stable enterprise distro (in this case SLES11), and
the pvops tree based off the latest kernel.org release.
As you've noticed above having two trees (2.6.18 + pv_ops) didn't work
out very well so far. I doubt s/2.6.18/2.6.27/ will change that ...
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home