WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg

To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
From: William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:51:53 -0500
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:52:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <18937.33764.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <18937.33764.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think you are talking about HVM PV drivers. HVM itself is no different
than booting a paravirtualized guest as far as the dom0 kernel is
concerned... the only difference is the running qemu-dm process or stub
domain.

William

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 02:14 -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> >I could pull a spare server out of the production 
> >grid for testing HVM under 2.6.30 if needed.
> 
> As far as to my knowledge Xen 3.4-rc3-pre Dom0 & (2.6.30-rc3-tip)
> support only PV DomUs. HVM is still unsolved problem.
> If i am wrong about that, please advise.
> 
> Boris.
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 4/28/09, William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         From: William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
>         To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>         Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 3:13 AM
>         
>         On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:48 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>         > William Pitcock
>          wrote:
>         > > Yeah, it's working here now. Thanks for that.
>         > >
>         > > We intend to start testing the 3.4 release candidate with 2.6.30
>         > > paravirt-ops dom0 in our test environment this weekend.
>         > >   
>         > 
>         > OK, that'll be interesting.  What's your test environment?
>         
>         Paravirtualization-only nocona-based (early EM64T) Xeon hardware, with
>         nodes comprising of dual 2.8ghz CPUs with 8GB of memory, on Debian
>         testing.
>         
>         Production is presently at 3.2 with XenLinux 2.6.18 patches rebased
>         against 2.6.26. Production machines are dual opteron 2216 machines 
> with
>         8GB-16GB of RAM, with both HVM and Paravirtualized domains.
>         
>         The test and production grids use the same storage backend, which is
>         presently provided through exporting LVM volumes with AoE and
>         cluster-lvm.
>         
>         I could pull a spare server out of the production grid for testing HVM
>         under 2.6.30 if
>          needed.
>         
>         William
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Xen-devel mailing list
>         Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>