Hmm.
I'll try to debug it if I have time over the weekend. It shouldn't be
very hard to do.
Do you have any specifics on what is failing?
William
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 08:01 -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> I am talking about usual HVM DomUs.
> >the only difference is the running qemu-dm process or stub
> > domain.
>
> That's failing with current 2.6.30-rc3-tip under Xen 3.4-rc3-pre
> at least through my experience.
> Should be well known issue for Jeremy.
>
> Boris.
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 4/28/09, William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
> To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "Xen-devel"
> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 10:51 AM
>
> I think you are talking about HVM PV drivers. HVM itself is no
> different
> than
> booting a paravirtualized guest as far as the dom0 kernel is
> concerned... the only difference is the running qemu-dm process or
> stub
> domain.
>
> William
>
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 02:14 -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > >I could pull a spare server out of the production
> > >grid for testing HVM under 2.6.30 if needed.
> >
> > As far as to my knowledge Xen 3.4-rc3-pre Dom0 & (2.6.30-rc3-tip)
> > support only PV DomUs. HVM is still unsolved problem.
> > If i am wrong about that, please advise.
> >
> > Boris.
> >
> >
> > --- On Tue, 4/28/09, William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > From: William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
> > To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:
> Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 3:13 AM
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:48 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
> wrote:
> > > William Pitcock
> > wrote:
> > > > Yeah, it's working here now. Thanks for that.
> > > >
> > > > We intend to start testing the 3.4 release candidate
> with 2.6.30
> > > > paravirt-ops dom0 in our test environment this weekend.
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK, that'll be interesting. What's your test
> environment?
> >
> > Paravirtualization-only nocona-based (early EM64T) Xeon
> hardware,
> with
> > nodes comprising of dual 2.8ghz CPUs with 8GB of memory, on
> Debian
> > testing.
> >
> > Production is presently at 3.2 with XenLinux 2.6.18 patches
> rebased
> > against 2.6.26. Production machines
> are dual opteron 2216 machines
> with
> > 8GB-16GB of RAM, with both HVM and Paravirtualized domains.
> >
> > The test and production grids use the same storage backend,
> which
> is
> > presently provided through exporting LVM volumes with AoE
> and
> > cluster-lvm.
> >
> > I could pull a spare server out of the production grid for
> testing
> HVM
> > under 2.6.30 if
> > needed.
> >
> > William
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home