| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
It's also always consistent with each one of rc1,rc2,rc3 kernels
Boris.
--- On Fri, 4/24/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, April 24, 2009, 2:17 PM
Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Kernel been built based on xen-tip/next appears to have name
2.6.30-rc2-tip
> and behaves under Xen 3.4-rc2-pre as usual. No problems were noticed with
PV DomUs
> for CentOS 5.3, F10, Ubuntu Server 9.04. However, remote VNC connection
to Ubuntu
> Server 9.04 PV DomU seems to be extrtemely slow. VNC
connection to same
DomU
> from Dom0 runs fine. I'll try to test this issue for CentOS and F10
DomUs ASAP.
> I also have to notice that remote VNC connection to Ubuntu 9.04 DomU
running at the same Xen 3.4 version Dom0 with Suse's 2.6.27.5 xen-ified
kernel behaves just fine.
> IP6v connection via vinagre (for Ubuntu Server 9.04 DomU) behaves exactly
same way as old fashioned. No problems when been established from Dom0 and
almost dead remotely.
>
Is it always consistent with the same kernel, or does it change from boot to
boot?
Could you try to work out what's actually failing with tcpdump/wireshark,
both from within the domU, and from dom0? Are packets getting lost on tx or rx,
or very delayed, or something else?
Thanks,
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing
list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home