|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b)
> Xmalloc/xfree can use alloc_domheap_pages always on x86/64.
> A temporary
> ifdef inside xmalloc is better than an extra xmalloc interface.
OK, I see. So what you want is xmalloc to be the only interface.
And "temporary" means until Xen no longer supports 32-bit at all?
Will you take this patch then? I think this patch meets your
objectives and is greatly simplified.
> Also, this will be a small patch you can carry in your own
> patchset for now.
I'm just trying to contribute to your stated objective:
> Xenheap will disappear entirely on x86/64 in future.
and trying to get the syntax/semantics pinned down. Is
this not what you intended to implement for 3.4? Or did
you have something entirely different in mind?
Thanks,
Dan
Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
xmalloc.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b),
Dan Magenheimer <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for32b), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for32b), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_startfor32b), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_startfor32b), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was:xen_phys_startfor32b), Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was:xen_phys_startfor32b), Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|