|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b)
> If this sounds sensible, I will spin a patch as I'm the one keen
> to get this settled.
Here's the patch I had in mind (compile-tested only).
xmalloc.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b),
Dan Magenheimer <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for32b), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for32b), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_startfor32b), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_startfor32b), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was:xen_phys_startfor32b), Jan Beulich
|
|
|
|
|