Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>]

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> a "cleanup" impact line is only added if the change is not intended to  
>> have any side-effects whatsoever.
>>
>> We can drop it but it would be really nice to figure out what's going  
>> on. In a very quick late-night look i cannot see anything particularly  
>> weird about it, but based on the type of changes it does there are  
>> three leading candidates: lost high 32 bits, zero extend problem, or  
>> incorrect types.
>
> Interestingly, the Xen code appears to be the *only* user of 
> pud_page - and only via pgd_page in PAE mode.

where exactly is that use? My grep didnt show any users of pud_page(). 
pud_page() was changed in an incompatible way, all users of it must be 
updated.

        Ingo

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel