xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:31 -0500, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
>>
>>> 2.6.28-rc3 - Brought up 1 CPUs, eventually dies with:
>>> http://p.linode.com/1408
>>>
>>
>> I've been seeing this too. I bisected it down to:
>>
>> ab00fee30cddf975200b3c97aef25bea144a0d89 is first bad commit
>> commit ab00fee30cddf975200b3c97aef25bea144a0d89
>> Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu Oct 30 10:37:21 2008 +0000
>> i386/PAE: fix pud_page()
>> Impact: cleanup
>> To the unsuspecting user it is quite annoying
>> that this broken and
>> inconsistent with x86-64 definition still exists.
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>> <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
>> :040000 040000 3b49a9d3792e9f02dd799ad4deb69922d2a085d0
>> f0136498ef53b36172dca595f11a784f43bebcea M arch
>>
>> It's late so figuring out how it broke can wait for tomorrow.
>>
>> The interesting bit from the link given is below.
>>
>
> Ah, OK.
>
> Ingo, Jan:
>
> Did this patch actually fix anything, or was it just a cleanup? It
> seems to have broken 32-bit Xen in some way, so if its just a cleanup it
> would be best to drop it until we've worked out what's going on.
no, it was pure cleanup. The impact line shows this:
>> Impact: cleanup
a "cleanup" impact line is only added if the change is not intended to
have any side-effects whatsoever.
We can drop it but it would be really nice to figure out what's going
on. In a very quick late-night look i cannot see anything particularly
weird about it, but based on the type of changes it does there are
three leading candidates: lost high 32 bits, zero extend problem, or
incorrect types.
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Christopher S. Aker
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Christopher S. Aker
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Stefan de Konink
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU,
Ingo Molnar <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU, Jan Beulich
|
|
|