WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!

To: "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!
From: "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 10:50:29 -0600
Cc: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Winchell <dwinchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 09:55:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
Reply-to: "dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acj1iQfsUvemUZOnSa6LjZrOeI3kWA==
The synchronization of local_time_calibration (l_t_c) via
round-to-nearest-epoch provided some improvement, but I was
still seeing skew up to 16usec and higher.  I measured the
temporal distance between the rounded-epoch vs when ltc
was actually running to ensure there wasn't some kind of
bug and found that l_t_c was running up to 150us after the
round-epoch and sometimes up to 50us before.  I guess this
is the granularity of setting a Xen timer.  While it seemed
that +/- 100us shouldn't cause that much skew, I finally
decided to try synchronization-via-rendezvous, as suggested
by Ian here:

http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-07/msg01074.html
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-07/msg01080.html

The result is phenomenal... using this approach (in attached
patch), I have yet to see a skew exceed 1usec!!!  So this is
about a 10-fold increase in accuracy vs the rounded-epoch
method and about 20-fold over the one-epoch-from-NOW() method.

The platform time is now read once for all processors rather
than once per processor.  (Actually, it is read once again
in platform_time_calibration()... by "inlining" that routine
into master_local_time_calibration() that extra read can
be -- and probably should be -- avoided too.)

It may be too late to get this into 3.3.0 but, if so, please
consider it asap for 3.3.1 rather than just xen-unstable/3.4.

Dan

===================================
Thanks... for the memory
I really could use more / My throughput's on the floor
The balloon is flat / My swap disk's fat / I've OOM's in store
Overcommitted so much
(with apologies to the late great Bob Hope)

Attachment: rendezcalib.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel