|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support |
From: |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:44:04 +0200 |
Cc: |
Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:44:43 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<486927AB.1060006@xxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<4863A8E6.1010807@xxxxxxxx> <20080627160333.GA27072@xxxxxxx> <486539A3.3030102@xxxxxxxx> <20080629084318.GA28815@xxxxxxx> <48684CD4.7040403@xxxxxxxx> <20080630082135.GA22844@xxxxxxx> <20080630092209.GA29815@xxxxxxx> <48691524.5010806@xxxxxxxx> <20080630181221.GF23739@xxxxxxx> <486927AB.1060006@xxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> try 'make ARCH=i386 oldconfig' - does it work better that way?
>
> Er, we're talking about 64-bit here, aren't we? The log messages are
> from a 64-bit kernel.
>
> Well, it was the wrong config anyway, which I guess is the source of
> this confusion.
yeah.
> (I thought ARCH= to select 32/64 was going away now that the config
> has the bitsize config?)
yep, correct - but it has to be done carefully - until now people (and
tools) could assume that 'make oldconfig' just creates stuff for their
native host architecture. But i agree in principle.
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support,
Ingo Molnar <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Andi Kleen
|
|
|
|
|