xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit
To: |
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support |
From: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:32:26 -0700 |
Cc: |
Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:32:51 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<86802c440806292135k776f5cefhe4371c654f438962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<patchbomb.1214367536@localhost> <20080625152212.GA3442@xxxxxxx> <4862A6A9.1030109@xxxxxxxx> <20080626105722.GA12640@xxxxxxx> <20080626105818.GA13805@xxxxxxx> <4863A8E6.1010807@xxxxxxxx> <20080627160333.GA27072@xxxxxxx> <486539A3.3030102@xxxxxxxx> <20080629084318.GA28815@xxxxxxx> <48684CD4.7040403@xxxxxxxx> <86802c440806292135k776f5cefhe4371c654f438962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) |
Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
with this config:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Sun_Jun_29_10_29_11_CEST_2008.bad
i've saved the merged 2.6.26-rc8-tip-00241-gc6c8cb2-dirty tree into
tip/tmp.x86.xen-64bit.Sun_Jun_29_10 and pushed it out, so you can test that
exact version.
Looks like the setup.c unification missed the early_ioremap init from the
early_ioremap unification. Unconditionally call early_ioremap_init().
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff -r 5c26177fdf8c arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c Sun Jun 29 16:57:52 2008 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c Sun Jun 29 19:57:00 2008 -0700
@@ -523,11 +523,12 @@
memcpy(&boot_cpu_data, &new_cpu_data, sizeof(new_cpu_data));
pre_setup_arch_hook();
early_cpu_init();
- early_ioremap_init();
reserve_setup_data();
#else
printk(KERN_INFO "Command line: %s\n", boot_command_line);
#endif
+
+ early_ioremap_init();
ROOT_DEV = old_decode_dev(boot_params.hdr.root_dev);
screen_info = boot_params.screen_info;
it could be wrong? do we need that for 64 bit?
Yes. I unified the early_ioremap implementations by making 64-bit use
the 32-bit one.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Yinghai Lu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|