xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit
To: |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support |
From: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:17:24 -0700 |
Cc: |
Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:17:50 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20080630092209.GA29815@xxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<20080625152212.GA3442@xxxxxxx> <4862A6A9.1030109@xxxxxxxx> <20080626105722.GA12640@xxxxxxx> <20080626105818.GA13805@xxxxxxx> <4863A8E6.1010807@xxxxxxxx> <20080627160333.GA27072@xxxxxxx> <486539A3.3030102@xxxxxxxx> <20080629084318.GA28815@xxxxxxx> <48684CD4.7040403@xxxxxxxx> <20080630082135.GA22844@xxxxxxx> <20080630092209.GA29815@xxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) |
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
with this config:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Sun_Jun_29_10_29_11_CEST_2008.bad
i've saved the merged 2.6.26-rc8-tip-00241-gc6c8cb2-dirty tree into
tip/tmp.x86.xen-64bit.Sun_Jun_29_10 and pushed it out, so you can test
that exact version.
Looks like the setup.c unification missed the early_ioremap init from
the early_ioremap unification. Unconditionally call
early_ioremap_init().
applied to tip/x86/unify-setup - thanks Jeremy.
I've reactived the x86/xen-64bit branch and i'm testing it currently.
-tip auto-testing found pagetable corruption (CPA self-test failure):
[ 32.956015] CPA self-test:
[ 32.958822] 4k 2048 large 508 gb 0 x
2556[ffff880000000000-ffff88003fe00000] miss 0
[ 32.964000] CPA ffff88001d54e000: bad pte 1d4000e3
[ 32.968000] CPA ffff88001d54e000: unexpected level 2
[ 32.972000] CPA ffff880022c5d000: bad pte 22c000e3
[ 32.976000] CPA ffff880022c5d000: unexpected level 2
[ 32.980000] CPA ffff8800200ce000: bad pte 200000e3
[ 32.984000] CPA ffff8800200ce000: unexpected level 2
[ 32.988000] CPA ffff8800210f0000: bad pte 210000e3
config and full log can be found at:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Mon_Jun_30_11_11_51_CEST_2008.bad
That config doesn't build for me. When I put it in place and do "make
oldconfig" it still asks for lots of config options (which I just set to
default). But when I build it fails with:
CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include2/asm/page.h:40,
from include2/asm/pda.h:8,
from include2/asm/current.h:19,
from include2/asm/processor.h:15,
from
/home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/include/linux/prefetch.h:14,
from /home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/include/linux/list.h:6,
from
/home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/include/linux/module.h:9,
from
/home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/include/linux/crypto.h:21,
from
/home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_64.c:7,
from
/home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:4:
include2/asm/page_64.h:46:2: error: #error "CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START must be a multiple
of 2MB"
make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
I can fix that, of course, but it doesn't give me confidence I'm testing
what you are...
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Yinghai Lu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Andi Kleen
|
|
|