WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue

To: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:32:36 +0000
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:39:43 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87k5jnl7qt.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7k4pawfnxs.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C40D3B88.15566%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7k1w5zf50j.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18408.57824.846687.465435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080325175718.GT4411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7ky786dkup.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18410.9596.488204.878357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7ktziseo9r.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080327090831.2a9f9b05@core> <18411.52353.526441.433440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080327163046.7984cf3f@core> <18411.56273.121309.975760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87k5jnl7qt.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andi Kleen writes ("Re: Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue"):
> It would be certainly possible to implement kernel interfaces
> that would allow discovering the error easily. I guess aio could
> pass it somewhere

In principle, yes.  But like your other proposals, I don't think
that's really a practical answer.  If such a kernel interface appears
then we should use it.

In the meantime people who want this kind of error reporting and
recovery should turn the emulated drive's cache off.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>