|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue
To: |
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue |
From: |
Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:34:47 +0000 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:51:51 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<18410.10932.522487.743717@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Organization: |
Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 |
References: |
<7k4pawfnxs.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C40D3B88.15566%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7k1w5zf50j.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18408.57824.846687.465435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080325175718.GT4411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7ky786dkup.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18410.9596.488204.878357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080326102744.3124cbb4@core> <18410.10932.522487.743717@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> Hrm. I think it would be better to return an endless sequence of
> errors than to return no error at all. Since we don't know which
> block failed, we could report an error flushing block 0, and then an
> error flushing block 1, and so on ?
On a raid volume that will give wrong results and incorrect recovery
behaviour. You need to report correct information. In addition a lot of
software treats repeated errors on flush as a device failure after a
certain count.
If a write to the underlying emulated media fails you know at least which
write fails and usually the page that failed (as you get a short write)
Alan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Kouya Shimura
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Samuel Thibault
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Kouya Shimura
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Samuel Thibault
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Alan Cox
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue,
Alan Cox <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Kouya Shimura
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Alan Cox
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Alan Cox
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Kouya Shimura
- Message not available
- [Xen-devel] Re: Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson
|
|
|
|
|