WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] tools - Remove machine setting from HOSTCFLA

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] tools - Remove machine setting from HOSTCFLAGS
From: Bastian Blank <bastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:46:32 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:47:09 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C3C263C2.12EF4%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080127161220.GA6621@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C3C263C2.12EF4%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:37:22PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Then you would not have 'uname -m' indicating x86_64 or amd64, and so
> XEN_COMPILE_ARCH would be x86_32 by default?

No. uname -m == x86_64 and XEN_TARGET_ARCH = x86_64, but the system
lacks critical parts to execute the x86_64 binaries.

Bastian

-- 
Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude.
                -- Spock, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel