|
xen-devel
[Xense-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technol
|
To: |
"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xense-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support |
|
From: |
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:52:00 +0000 |
|
Cc: |
"Xu, James" <james.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:52:39 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<D936D925018D154694D8A362EEB0892002C7C389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xense-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
"A discussion list for those developing security enhancements for Xen." <xense-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xense-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xense-devel>, <mailto:xense-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xense-devel>, <mailto:xense-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xense-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcgYPKeHAh+s/rrjQ0OzxTZHSH6adQB0Zgj0AAzUsnAAA3v0QgAAvpSgAAB6yw4= |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618 |
On 29/10/07 17:41, "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Why is the memory region not marked as E820_UNUSABLE by tboot? And/or
> extend
>> the multiboot info structure and transmit the address of the shared
> page
>> that way.
>
> I didn't mark it as UNUSABLE because dom0 doesn't like low memory that
> it can't probe and I didn't realize that there would be a problem with
> marking it RESERVED. However, I can mark it as UNUSABLE and then when I
> find it, change it to RESERVED. I'll send a patch for this as well.
By low memory, do you mean the signature is in the bottom megabyte of
memory? If that's guaranteed then can we just scan the whole lot
0x00000-0xfffff (excluding VGA hole)?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xense-devel mailing list
Xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xense-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Cihula, Joseph
- [Xense-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Cihula, Joseph
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Cihula, Joseph
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Keir Fraser
- [Xense-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support, Cihula, Joseph
- RE: [Xense-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted ExecutionTechnology support, Cihula, Joseph
|
|
|
Home