WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xense-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technol

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xense-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support
From: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:53:24 -0700
Cc: "Xu, James" <james.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:56:03 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C34BB154.17937%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xense-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: "A discussion list for those developing security enhancements for Xen." <xense-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xense-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xense-devel>, <mailto:xense-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xense-devel>, <mailto:xense-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <D936D925018D154694D8A362EEB0892002C7C0AD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C34BB154.17937%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xense-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcgYPKeHAh+s/rrjQ0OzxTZHSH6adQB0Zgj0AAzUsnAAAGYLxQACJLxQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology support
On Monday, October 29, 2007 8:49 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 29/10/07 15:38, "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> Seems to be missing asm-x86/tboot.h.
>> 
>> The build for tboot/tboot copies this file from tboot/include to
>> xen/include/asm-x86.  Do you prefer that it get checked in to Xen's
repo
>> instead?
> 
> Oh, yes I do. It is supposed to be a stable interface so this should
be
> okay.

I'll send a patch for this.

> 
> I'm not taking the Makefile changes at this point anyway. We don't
wget and
> build any other bootloader components as part of the Xen build.

Would you prefer it to be checked out with mercurial or just left as an
exercise for the user to download and build on his own?

> 
>  -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xense-devel mailing list
Xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xense-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>