WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] compile error of HVM pv drivers

To: "Kieran Mansley" <kmansley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] compile error of HVM pv drivers
From: "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:15:21 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:13:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1185804320.4287.53.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcfSsrfF0p74rTYuSoidXev2CuSlTQAARM+g
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] compile error of HVM pv drivers
>On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 21:49 +0800, Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>> >Does gcc 3.4.2 cope OK with the rest of the kernel?
>> >There are many other uses of netif_tx_lock_bh() and so it would be
>> >interesting to know if it's something about that function, or
something
>> >about the way it's used in this instance that triggers the error.
>
>Any thoughts on that one?
[Yunfeng] I will try this tomorrow. Current I am not in office, and I
have the env to do this.

>
>> >Any other information you can give that would help reproduce this
would
>> >be of great assistance.  E.g. kernel source version, exactly which
>> >distribution, exactly which gcc (e.g. is it a version that might
have
>> >been modified by a linux vendor), etc.
>> [Yunfeng] The build was tried on a FC3 root fs with using the gcc of
>> fc3,
>
>Which one? :)  There were probably multiple versions.  E.g. the fc3 box
>I have access to is using:
>[~]$ gcc --version
>gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 20050227 (Red Hat 3.4.3-22.fc3)
>
>I've had a look in the Changelog for both GCC and the redhat RPM from
>around that time (between 3.4.2-1.fc3 and 3.4.3-22.fc3) and can't see
>anything obvious that would have fixed this, but sometimes these things
>aren't obvious.
>
>If you can try the version of gcc that works for me, that would be
>useful for ruling out it being something else that I'm doing that makes
>it work:
>
>http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/updates/3/i386/gcc-3.4.3-22.fc3.i38
6.ht
>ml
[Yunfeng] I will try this tomorrow.

>
>Kieran

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel