WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 03/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: use paravirt_nop to cons

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 03/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: use paravirt_nop to consistently mark no-op operations
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:18:34 -0700
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:16:50 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45FB15E8.4080406@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070301232443.195603797@xxxxxxxx> <20070301232526.261284776@xxxxxxxx> <20070316094432.GU23174@xxxxxxx> <45FAE560.10401@xxxxxxxx> <20070316194904.GO10574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45FAF77A.8010607@xxxxxxxx> <20070316215916.GP10574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45FB15E8.4080406@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
> > I mean like this (bunch of work, for a type check that we're really ignoring
> > anwyay, but this is the idea...)
> 
> Oh, I see.  I think this is the best argument yet for the current
> arrangement...

Heh, like I said it's a bunch of work for literally nothing ;-)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>