 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls
| To: | Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:00:12 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:59:35 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <45F828EB.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcdmUdjbF2+ksdJFEdu8zgAX8io7RQ== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
On 14/3/07 15:55, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Many places currently don't even check HYPERVISOR_multicall()'s return > value, not to speak of checking the individual status codes. Would it be > acceptable to add an argument to this function to request to either fold > all status values into a global success code, or to force BUG_ON() each > individual status. Or should I rather add a new function with described > behavior? Or are there other suggestions? I think a separate function would be neater, but I'm not sure what you'd call it. :-) The general idea seems a good one. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Cs/ 14346 breaks 64bit hv, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking, Anthony Liguori |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
