 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:55:07 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:53:21 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Many places currently don't even check HYPERVISOR_multicall()'s return value, not to speak of checking the individual status codes. Would it be acceptable to add an argument to this function to request to either fold all status values into a global success code, or to force BUG_ON() each individual status. Or should I rather add a new function with described behavior? Or are there other suggestions? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [Queries] Unpinning and Unhooking shadow, Tim Deegan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] do_update_va_mapping_otherdomain(), Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [Queries] Unpinning and Unhooking shadow, jeet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] return value checking on multicalls, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
