| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: vaddr_t and vsize_t
On 18/1/07 7:13 am, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I suppose I don't mind vaddr_t being defined and people using it if they
>> want to. At least it is probably clearer that translation to/from char* or
>> long to do pointer arithmetic. However, I'm less sure about a wholesale
>> conversion of Xen away from use of 'unsigned long'.
>
> Ok. I will prepare a patch. Someone has to make the start. :-)
Start with a small patch and let's see how it goes.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home