|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
Hi Keir, this fix is critical to stability of HVM.
BTW, we are fixing MOVS and INS/OUTS for HVM, hopefully sending the patch
tomorrow, acturally the code is totally messed up, althought they are nearly
never used, but we believe they do introduce stability issue.
thanks
-Xin
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Li, Xin B
>Sent: 2006年10月13日 3:10
>To: Xen Devel
>Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>
>an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept.
>In PIC IO, address from send_pio_req is physical address already.
>
>Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept,
Li, Xin B <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept, Li, Xin B
|
|
|
|
|