WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen Devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
From: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:09:08 +0800
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:09:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbuMfZd+m00pUnBSgOFo1LNeBzEQQA1Z+fQAAI773AAABpAWgAAhoHQAAA5BC8AAAN3gA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
No, I think we can put it after 3.0.3 is released :-)
-Xin 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2006年10月14日 5:54
>To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>
>Does it fix a reproducible issue? If not it can wait til after 3.0.3-0.
>
> -- Keir
>
>On 13/10/06 11:01 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I want you to review first :-), if it's ok, I will resend 
>base on new tip.
>> 
>> -Xin 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: 2006年10月14日 5:46
>>> To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>>> 
>>> 
>>> No signed-off-by -- are you posting this just for info right now?
>>> 
>>> The other (PIC) patch is fine. I'll take it for 3.0.3.
>>> 
>>> -- Keir
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 13/10/06 10:44 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  this patch is to fix INS/OUTS.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Xin
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Li, Xin B
>>>>> Sent: 2006年10月14日 4:43
>>>>> To: Li, Xin B; Xen Devel
>>>>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO 
>intercept
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Keir, this fix is critical to stability of HVM.
>>>>> BTW, we are fixing MOVS and INS/OUTS for HVM, hopefully
>>>>> sending the patch tomorrow, acturally the code is totally
>>>>> messed up, althought they are nearly never used, but we
>>>>> believe they do introduce stability issue.
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> -Xin 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>>> Of Li, Xin B
>>>>>> Sent: 2006年10月13日 3:10
>>>>>> To: Xen Devel
>>>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept.
>>>>>> In PIC IO, address from send_pio_req is physical address already.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel