WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 09/33] Add start-of-day setup hooks to subarc

To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 09/33] Add start-of-day setup hooks to subarch
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:49:26 -0700
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:27:50 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1153217033.3038.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060718091807.467468000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060718091950.750213000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1153217033.3038.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613)
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
what is this for? Isn't this 1) undocumented and 2) unclear and 3)
ugly ? (I'm pretty sure the HAVE_ARCH_* stuff is highly deprecated for
new things nowadays)

It appears to be completely unnecessary. Xen doesn't use sanitize_e820_map(), but there's no obvious harm in leaving it there (and it's init code, so there's no long-term cost).


   J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>