Re: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing
From:	harish <mvharish@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:58:39 -0700
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:59:01 -0700
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZtHnzZ5xsmCFIoXu0aobSQCthnj6dpTwcKpdGUxG0Fe6+0tl8aEhddXm9A9iw4mygnPIHRFrsLrtBOjJoXJO0nJv5+DfYTYCoKPalrJdV6E2dWD/qJKr0zNoDgBdM06zQKm8w/ods7e0dwRHdI33LDAdXJixyJ+BN0x99patS8I=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<260b1f3e22421d58dd152a6969f106fc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<a33d0a9f0605220943q75af2d77m8fbf1508a2ad9a88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3289dc4a0f8d31e751f7fb5edbb0066a@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <a33d0a9f0606091139w5e5178f7x28d98db5721ceb76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <260b1f3e22421d58dd152a6969f106fc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Keir,
echo "2" > /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity does not seem to change the value in smp_affinity
cat /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity still shows 0f

Could there some bug or configuration problem that you can think of?

thanks
hmv

On 6/10/06, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 9 Jun 2006, at 19:39, harish wrote:

> Is it possible to use smp_afffinity to pin the interrupts to specific
> pcpus.
>
> In my machine:
>
> cat /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity
> 0f
>
> I tried
> echo "2" > /proc/irq/23/smp_affinity [with the hope that the
> interrupts get routed to pcpu1]
>
> But do not see the new value taking effect. I am missing something.
> thanks in advance,

That should definitely work and have an effect on /proc/interrupts.

-- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing