| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] xenoprof fixes: active_domains races
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 16 May 2006, at 10:47, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Is it okay to include the conversion to mutex in xen-specific code?
>
> Any semaphores that were added by the xenoprofile patches should be
> changed to mutexes. The rest should be left alone.
Done. Patch for the rest just went to lkml.
>> There's machinery to go from sparse tree + patches to full tree (make
>> prep-kernels). Is there a way to propagate changes from full tree
>> pack to sparse tree + patches, where hg diff takes care of creating
>> patchfiles?
>
> Not as far as I know. I touch them infrequently enough that when I do
> I simply re-create the patches manually.
>
> If you want, provide a single patch in the same form as your two
> previous ones then I'll turn it into patch-of-a-patch format and check
> it in.
On its way. Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home