|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 34/35] Add the Xen virtual network device dri
To: |
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 34/35] Add the Xen virtual network device driver. |
From: |
Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 9 May 2006 16:39:11 -0700 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 09 May 2006 16:36:24 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20060509115633.36b4879e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<20060509084945.373541000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060509085201.446830000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060509115633.36b4879e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
* Stephen Hemminger (shemminger@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> The stuff in /proc could easily just be added attributes to the class_device
> kobject
> of the net device (and then show up in sysfs).
Agreed, it's on the todo list to drop proc support there. Thought that
was marked in the patch.
> > +#define GRANT_INVALID_REF 0
> > +
> > +#define NET_TX_RING_SIZE __RING_SIZE((struct netif_tx_sring *)0, PAGE_SIZE)
> > +#define NET_RX_RING_SIZE __RING_SIZE((struct netif_rx_sring *)0, PAGE_SIZE)
> > +
> > +static inline void init_skb_shinfo(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + atomic_set(&(skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref), 1);
> > + skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags = 0;
> > + skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL;
> > +}
>
> Could you use existing sk_buff_head instead of inventing your
> own skb queue?
Hmm, there is some standard skb_queue_tail happening. I don't have a
clear idea what you mean.
> > + u8 mac[ETH_ALEN];
>
> Isn't mac address already stored in dev->dev_addr and/or dev->perm_addr?
Yes, I don't see the reason to keep in twice. It's basically a temp
buffer, but it certainly appears we can eliminate it.
thanks,
-chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|