|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 34/35] Add the Xen virtual network device dri
To: |
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 34/35] Add the Xen virtual network device driver. |
From: |
David Boutcher <boutcher@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 9 May 2006 09:30:53 -0500 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 04:22:11 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20060509140027.GD7834@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
virtualization-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/09/2006 09:00:27 AM:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:26:03PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Possibly having to page in the process and switching to it would add
> > > to the live migration time. More importantly, having to install an
> > > additional program in the guest is certainly not very convenient.
> >
> > Sorry I'm still not convinced. What's there to stop me from
suspending
> > my laptop to disk, moving it from port A to port B and resuming it?
> >
> > Wouldn't I be in exactly the same situation? By the same reasoning
we'd
> > be adding a gratuitous ARP routine to every single laptop network
driver.
>
> It is the same situation except that in the laptop case you don't care
> that reconfiguring your network will take a second or a few. For live
> migration we're looking at network downtime from as low as 60ms to
> something like 210ms on a busy virtual machine. I'm not saying that
> a userspace solution wouldn't work but it would probably add a
measurable
> delay to the network downtime during live migration.
Then make a generic solution. VMWare supports migration, the Power
virtualization will get around to it eventually. All will need something
similar. So either make a common user-land tool, or (if you insist on
incorrectly driving this into the kernel) add some kind of common hook to
the TCP/IP stack.
Dave Boutcher
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|