On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:09:49PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > +/*
> > + * This needs to use 'idt_table' rather than 'idt', and
> > + * thus use the _nonmapped_ version of the IDT, as the
> > + * Pentium F0 0F bugfix can have resulted in the mapped
> > + * IDT being write-protected.
> > + */
> > +void set_intr_gate(unsigned int n, void *addr)
> > +{
> > + _set_gate(idt_table+n,14,0,addr,__KERNEL_CS);
> > +}
>
> No need to duplicate the various set_*_gate functions into the subarchs.
Indeed, we'll change that. Thanks.
christian
> > +static void __init set_task_gate(unsigned int n, unsigned int gdt_entry)
> > +{
> > + /* _set_gate(n, 5, 0, 0, (gdt_entry<<3)); */
> > +}
>
> Looks weird, but can be handled in the low level function.
>
> -Andi
> _______________________________________________
> Virtualization mailing list
> Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home