Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series

[Dave Feustel <dfeustel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 21 November 2005 09:36, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:25:20AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > Could you post an example (from the patches, if possible) of 
> > an "anonymous inline function"?
> 
> that what you call code block that are nested into another one
> without having any do, while, if, for ...
> 
> they are almost like an inlined function in term of code and as they
> don't got a label, that make them anonymous.
> 
> example:
> 
> int fct(void)
> {
>       int i;
> 
>       ...
>       {
>               int j;
>               ...
>       }
>       ...
> }
> 
> the patches contains lots of them everywhere.

Thanks for posting the example with explanation.
What about this example bothers you and makes
you think this use of brackets should not be permitted
(if in fact this is your position)?
-- 
Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
NOW with Virtual PC OS support via QEMU and
Beowulf clustering using PETSc and MPICH2!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel