WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Build

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David F Barrera" <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Build
From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:32:57 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:31:10 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcWozlgO3PxRURDnRq+KzKkG5ICGmQAAwPZgAA1q9MAAIoaNYA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Build
This problem has been fixed by the changeset 6395, and all the
processors are up on x86_64 SMP xenlinux. Thanks a lot for the cleanups,
Keir.

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center


Nakajima, Jun wrote:
>> 
>> I'm also seeing SMP dom0 broken, and only 1 CPU is up:
>> 
>> Booting processor 1/1 rip ffffffff80100014 rsp ffff8801ee715f58
>> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1455) Bad type (saw 00000000f0000001!=
>> exp 00000000a0000000) for mfn 9d000 (pfn 0)
>> Booting processor 2/2 rip ffffffff80100014 rsp ffff8801ee71ff58
>> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1455) Bad type (saw 00000000f0000001!=
>> exp 00000000a0000000) for mfn 9d002 (pfn 2)
>> ...
>> 
>> 
>> Jun
>> ---
>> Intel Open Source Technology Center
>> 
> If I revert the changeset 6379, they are back.
> 
> --- a/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/xen/x86_64/kernel/setup.c     Wed Aug
> 24 15:22:44 2005
> +++ b/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/xen/x86_64/kernel/setup.c     Wed Aug
> 24 15:46:33 2005
> @@ -428,8 +428,9 @@
>  {
>          unsigned long bootmap_size = init_bootmem(start_pfn,
>          end_pfn); free_bootmem(0, end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -        /* XXX KAF: Why can't we leave low 1MB of memory free? */
> -        reserve_bootmem(0, (PFN_PHYS(start_pfn) + bootmap_size +
> PAGE_SIZE-1));
> +        reserve_bootmem(HIGH_MEMORY,
> +                        (PFN_PHYS(start_pfn) + bootmap_size +
> PAGE_SIZE-1)
> +                        - HIGH_MEMORY);
>  }
>  #else
>  static void __init contig_initmem_init(void)
> 
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>