|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]vbd/vnif paravirtulization driver hypervisorsuppo
> On 5/25/05, Ling, Xiaofeng <xiaofeng.ling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Is there any comment for this patch?
> > Is it acceptable or not?
>
> yes, i have the same question. sometimes patches sent to the
> list receive no comment. that means they are in queu for
> review, and get feedbacks later? or we should re-send the
> patches to the list (as in
> LKML) ?
It's safest to assume that this is a lossy communication channel: If
after a few days you haven't heard anything and the patch hasn't been
checked in, please send a follow up message.
BTW: It's very helpful if the patch contains a good description of what
it does and the rational behind the design, either in the changelog or
in comments as appropriate. This save a lot of review time.
Further it would make our lives a lot easier if people at least checked
that patches build and work on both x86 and x86_64. Building with an
ia64 cross compiler would be good too, but I must admit that we don't
usually do this, though we'll probably have to once ia64 gets a larger
user community.
Thanks,
Ian
> i think the policy of accepting patches should be made clear,
> and put into the FAQ. that would be appreciated by contributors.
>
> thank you,
> aq
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|