WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]vbd/vnif paravirtulization driver hypervisorsuppo

To: "Ling, Xiaofeng" <xiaofeng.ling@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]vbd/vnif paravirtulization driver hypervisorsupport]
From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:33:25 +0900
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 May 2005 03:32:47 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ofCRSLMAbkADhxaNYNXPxz7wCvbKk7sz3ximR6FCZlKNxkM4OeaJSVcSetfiN/6AeQyvh94NwVaETgMLQ0b5TS+Wy17OgBW2+Tps2fdzSzeiEp/HJKgDe9Mvs2hpOsWKt7L7E4h3MPMpFUFBShya0QTegML/Hs94bS2H8/hFQvA=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F840836E46C@pdsmsx403>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AcVdBMqGMA2IEEsTSdm26uwqvN7GUwDyn0Kw> <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F840836E46C@pdsmsx403>
Reply-to: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/25/05, Ling, Xiaofeng <xiaofeng.ling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there any comment for this patch?
> Is it acceptable or not?

yes, i have the same question. sometimes patches sent to the list
receive no comment. that means they are in queu for review, and get
feedbacks later? or we should re-send the patches to the list (as in
LKML) ?

i think the policy of accepting patches should be made clear, and put
into the FAQ. that would be appreciated by contributors.

thank you,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel