 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64-phys-ma.patch
| To: | Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64-phys-ma.patch |
| From: | Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 May 2005 23:04:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 12 May 2005 22:04:15 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hG2XAopiKgMWzEqNclTQ5fK4fQN3bXv4RXvTvjBbKfrG7YHwyryYwQluV2z1SjFrc13LcjWMJPDHfkzsjMePuC3hFDZlVCmVTYKOzbSQeNuCpa256mmNbH4fYidfDhYc0lSWbEaRGNHYg7GcD5cCln60r/uDiVrDCLjnx7DpuYw= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4283D10A.5080007@xxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20050512210714.GA29374@xxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205051214305076efc5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4283D10A.5080007@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 5/12/05, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Christian Limpach wrote:
> > On 5/12/05, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>phys is machine physical already. So we shouldn't try to convert guest
> >>physical to machine physical.
> >
> >
> > Are you sure that the test a few lines further down shouldn't use (a
> > to be defined -- see i386) pte_val_ma to compare the currently
> > installed pte with the to-be-installed one? You might be comparing
> > random values otherwise...
> >
>
> Sounds reasonable. I tested that this incremental patch doesn't cause
> any new regressions.
Thanks -- checked in.
christian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64-phys-ma.patch, Arun Sharma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Weekly test report on VT machine, Yu, Lifeng |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64-phys-ma.patch, Arun Sharma |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [patch] double incrementing l2tab, Scott Parish |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
